Page 18 of 23

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 31 May 2017 22:57
by Dorrien
Ody, I don't hate or even dislike you, I am just flamey. It is a fault of mine. Offer up a solid better solution then but you have a large player base who put in the work that once there, do not think it was overly difficult. I have probably said EVERYTHING the people I call complainers have said before. Does that make me a hypocrite? I don't think so, I think I have grown and learned that with a game like this you get to choose what you want to do and MOST people respect that. "Nah, I don't enjoy PvP can you not keep killing me?" They usually agree, but don't dare go attacking them later. The older generation is of a mindset it seems that size doesn't matter. We all know that it is essential for certain things but the game requires NOTHING of the player. You are not forced to be big to enjoy this game. There are players MUCH older than even I who are Great Adventurer. I have never heard them say getting big is too hard. They put their focus elsewhere.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 02:21
by Amberlee
To be honest.
A hard cap on size is a bad idea.
It would quite simply chase away WAY too many old players as they would have nothing to gain anymore.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 02:38
by Ody
Amberlee wrote:To be honest.
A hard cap on size is a bad idea.
It would quite simply chase away WAY too many old players as they would have nothing to gain anymore.

Cerin mentioned giving them something else to grind for instead of stats. Though he didn't give any specific ideas. I think a hard cap is fine if you give them something else to do. But let's be honest. Any change would chase away at least somebody.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 15:29
by Amberlee
Ody wrote:
Amberlee wrote:To be honest.
A hard cap on size is a bad idea.
It would quite simply chase away WAY too many old players as they would have nothing to gain anymore.

Cerin mentioned giving them something else to grind for instead of stats. Though he didn't give any specific ideas. I think a hard cap is fine if you give them something else to do. But let's be honest. Any change would chase away at least somebody.

Of course you think that's a good idea.
But I can assure you, it's not.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 18:00
by Zedex
Amberlee wrote: It would quite simply chase away WAY too many old players as they would have nothing to gain anymore.
And what is wrong with that? As long there is steady influx of new players it really doesn't matter and in a way can be beneficial to the game.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 18:31
by Amberlee
Because some players have made this place actually be a game for many years?

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 18:49
by Zedex
Amberlee wrote:Because some players have made this place actually be a game for many years?
I absolutely agree with you. Without them this game wouldn't survive years of stagnation. But as they become minority there is less and less reason for game cater to them.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 01 Jun 2017 19:00
by Amberlee
No they are still here and active as they always were.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 02 Jun 2017 07:36
by Johnny
I just don't see the point of creating a hard cap. It just sounds like smaller players want an even playing field. A hard cap only hurts older players.

Re: Non-flamey Size Discussion

Posted: 02 Jun 2017 09:34
by Tarax the Terrible
Even if you put a hard cap of supreme ++ or whatever.
Yes you could hit it on one or to stats
But to hit it on all stats would take a hella long time, even for current super myth. No?