What should a guild have for it's type?

Only validated game players have access in this forum. Use this forum to discuss guilds. Note that as a general rule, guild abilities should not be revealed.
Forum rules
- Use common sense and be respectful towards each other at all times, even when disagreeing.
- Do not reveal sensitive game information. Guild secrets, player seconds are examples of things not allowed.
TripleM
Greenhorne
Posts: 5
Joined: 19 Sep 2018 13:53

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by TripleM » 20 Sep 2018 20:31

Quite the issue indeed! I am wondering how long this bug is existing? I started playing again 9 months ago and I am pretty sure I would have noticed a bump of 270% in my specials. So I am guessing the issue is around probably (way) longer. One could argue it’s a feature of the game people have gotten used to. A feature that apparently has caused several unintended side-effects. A feature that caused disadvantages for certain guilds.

I guess I am going to be shelled over my comments because according to current investigations I as a Calian Blademaster must have taken great advantage of the issue. From my perspective the game has changed in many ways, but it certainly doesnt feel like we became overpowering in comparison to the rest of the realms. I actually think our numbers in bodies point entirely in a different direction. I can elaborate on why I think that is the case, but I dont think that's the purpose of current discussion. But it certainly doesnt seem like people are getting inline to gain from our unfair edge, should it exist.

I do not envy those who try to find a fair solution to current situation. There probably isnt one that wouldnt result in upsetting the vast majority of the playerbase. But if the best possible solution to a problem that probably exists for years is to buff every (fighter) guild but Calia, my prediction is that you will see the extinction of Calians, and many more players that will start playing the occ fighter/tank lay warlock/EW setup. Ironically the question whether or not that setup is too overpowering was the reason this discussion was started…

Tommo
Beginner
Posts: 15
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 07:57

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Tommo » 20 Sep 2018 20:45

TripleM wrote:Quite the issue indeed! I am wondering how long this bug is existing? I started playing again 9 months ago and I am pretty sure I would have noticed a bump of 270% in my specials. So I am guessing the issue is around probably (way) longer. One could argue it’s a feature of the game people have gotten used to. A feature that apparently has caused several unintended side-effects. A feature that caused disadvantages for certain guilds.

I guess I am going to be shelled over my comments because according to current investigations I as a Calian Blademaster must have taken great advantage of the issue. From my perspective the game has changed in many ways, but it certainly doesnt feel like we became overpowering in comparison to the rest of the realms. I actually think our numbers in bodies point entirely in a different direction. I can elaborate on why I think that is the case, but I dont think that's the purpose of current discussion. But it certainly doesnt seem like people are getting inline to gain from our unfair edge, should it exist.

I do not envy those who try to find a fair solution to current situation. There probably isnt one that wouldnt result in upsetting the vast majority of the playerbase. But if the best possible solution to a problem that probably exists for years is to buff every (fighter) guild but Calia, my prediction is that you will see the extinction of Calians, and many more players that will start playing the occ fighter/tank lay warlock/EW setup. Ironically the question whether or not that setup is too overpowering was the reason this discussion was started…
Couldn't agree more (obviously)- Remember that as a Calian also we only have access to our primary skills *some* of the time but pay tax all the time- I am not sure this is factored into any balance calculation ether.. solo you cant tank you cant DPS you cant do much vs your size but still pay full tax.. - I quite fancy a wand however - did I ever mention I am an elf??

:P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P

User avatar
Arman
Wizard
Posts: 522
Joined: 22 Sep 2014 13:15

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Arman » 21 Sep 2018 01:23

The error has been around for years TripleM... at least since specials were standardised, and probably before then too. So we are talking at least 10 years. :shock:

So you wouldn't have noticed it :)

Daerin
Apprentice
Posts: 25
Joined: 04 Aug 2018 17:32

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Daerin » 21 Sep 2018 07:19

So we are only talking about updated specials? Cause I have a hard time seeing monks strike or pirates pbash as over powered specials :)

Draugor
Myth
Posts: 1780
Joined: 06 Mar 2012 00:14

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Draugor » 21 Sep 2018 15:00

Daerin wrote:So we are only talking about updated specials? Cause I have a hard time seeing monks strike or pirates pbash as over powered specials :)

Well pirates pbash are not supposed to be powerfull per se, if monks have been recoded to the current speccs, they might even be getting an upgrade to that depending on how scewered it is

User avatar
Arman
Wizard
Posts: 522
Joined: 22 Sep 2014 13:15

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Arman » 21 Sep 2018 15:49

Daerin wrote:So we are only talking about updated specials? Cause I have a hard time seeing monks strike or pirates pbash as over powered specials :)
That's kind of the issue. Inflate a weak special by 270% vs a powerful special by 270%... big differences. Pirates have a special still weaker with the error than Blademasters attack is supposed to be... but Blademasters currently end up with a special more powerful than what swarm is supposed to be.

What it ends up with is that Blademasters end up with 170% more combat aid in real terms than Pirates do. Guilds with weaker special attacks have less combat aid than guilds with stronger attacks... the bigger the disparity in specials attacks, the greater the difference in caid gap between the guilds. This error throws global guild balance completely out.

Fixing the specials isn't the issue. The fix (as specials were originally intended) is coded, we just haven't implemented it. We really are not sure it is the fix we want.

Zugzug
Veteran
Posts: 233
Joined: 20 May 2017 15:25

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Zugzug » 21 Sep 2018 21:08

Arman wrote:
Daerin wrote:So we are only talking about updated specials? Cause I have a hard time seeing monks strike or pirates pbash as over powered specials :)
That's kind of the issue. Inflate a weak special by 270% vs a powerful special by 270%... big differences. Pirates have a special still weaker with the error than Blademasters attack is supposed to be... but Blademasters currently end up with a special more powerful than what swarm is supposed to be.

What it ends up with is that Blademasters end up with 170% more combat aid in real terms than Pirates do. Guilds with weaker special attacks have less combat aid than guilds with stronger attacks... the bigger the disparity in specials attacks, the greater the difference in caid gap between the guilds. This error throws global guild balance completely out.

Fixing the specials isn't the issue. The fix (as specials were originally intended) is coded, we just haven't implemented it. We really are not sure it is the fix we want.
I am curious (if you can share) how this has also affected defensive abilities of guilds. Are those balanced properly? When you are talking about specials, are you just talking about damage specials, or all specials in general?

User avatar
Arman
Wizard
Posts: 522
Joined: 22 Sep 2014 13:15

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Arman » 22 Sep 2018 02:12

Zugzug wrote:
Arman wrote:
Daerin wrote:So we are only talking about updated specials? Cause I have a hard time seeing monks strike or pirates pbash as over powered specials :)
That's kind of the issue. Inflate a weak special by 270% vs a powerful special by 270%... big differences. Pirates have a special still weaker with the error than Blademasters attack is supposed to be... but Blademasters currently end up with a special more powerful than what swarm is supposed to be.

What it ends up with is that Blademasters end up with 170% more combat aid in real terms than Pirates do. Guilds with weaker special attacks have less combat aid than guilds with stronger attacks... the bigger the disparity in specials attacks, the greater the difference in caid gap between the guilds. This error throws global guild balance completely out.

Fixing the specials isn't the issue. The fix (as specials were originally intended) is coded, we just haven't implemented it. We really are not sure it is the fix we want.
I am curious (if you can share) how this has also affected defensive abilities of guilds. Are those balanced properly? When you are talking about specials, are you just talking about damage specials, or all specials in general?
In general it doesn't, except where it mitigates special attack damage. They generally work as intended. But there are other defensive specials that have been made unbalanced by the offensive special error... obviously quickness-boosting specials... they magnify the error to a pretty ridiculous point. Other specials are too.. you could probably guess those ones that are using the correct formula as they feel comparatively underwhelming ;)

Targun
Adventurer
Posts: 81
Joined: 21 Oct 2010 01:31

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Targun » 25 Sep 2018 03:46

If I may throw in my two coppers.

Given for how long this error has been in place and how population has inflated in their levels during this time (especially considering the addition of more and more powerful 2h weapons, which further scale with the error... I don't think bringing the power of special attacks to "correct" state would be the way to address the problem. The reasons have already been lied out (new players, smaller players) and effectively the situation would be fairly resemblant to the period when there was an increased quest multiplier, just more severe.

For the intermediate measure, I would probably suggest tempering with the "Soft Cap Function" curve and flattening it for current myth+x average to accommodate for the increased power coming from special attacks at these levels.

This way bonus given by the 270% stronger special would be roughly mitigated at v. high levels, at the same time not hurting new players, who would gain experience in the similar pace current playerbase did. In other words, xp at very high levels would be gained proportionally slower to the bonus given by the special.

Of course, it does not address the real problem, including calculation of combat aid (towards which I have very strong reservations anyway)... but perhaps offers a middle ground, until a better and long term solution is found.

User avatar
Zhar
Wizard
Posts: 777
Joined: 17 Apr 2012 12:09

Re: What should a guild have for it's type?

Post by Zhar » 28 Feb 2019 17:35

A long time ago I had this crazy idea about guilds that would make balancing and maintaining them easier. Will post it here for posteriority and maybe it'll inspire someone.

First, there would be the generic guilds for each type: Fighter, Cleric, Mage, Ranger.
Each would have a lay and occ branch, with occ only being available to people who have achieved higher ranks in lay.
Example: Fighter lay would be something like the Cadets and occ more like Mercs (you could graduate from cadet to merc).

Now, this in itself would create a lot of possibilites for the players (all of those guilds would be free to join and neutral) since they could combine guilds as they wish (Fighter occ, Cleric lay etc.) and would form a base for all other, more specialized guilds.

The specialized guilds would take up the lay slot and work as a specialization. For example OCC Fighters could join DAs, gaining extra specials, skills, guildhall etc. OCC Mages could become Necromancers, Conjurers etc.

It could be great for balance since by balancing the base guild you're balancing all guilds of this type at the same time. It would also be great for creating new guilds, since you'd basically just do the add-on and wouldn't need to do everything from the ground up.

Just a crazy idea of an old fool :P
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.

Post Reply
http://tworzymyatmosfere.pl/przescieradla-jedwabne-z-gumka/