One might argue that lack of transparency is the cause though.gorboth wrote:The point was to see how players would feel about it. We got that.
Arman was not the one advocating for the nerf, and I was certainly not the one telling him or anyone else no. This is just the way things tend to go if we involve everyone in knowing all the information.
Transparency is not a panacea!
G.
If the game were nerfed ...
Forum rules
- Use common sense and be respectful towards each other at all times, even when disagreeing.
- Do not reveal sensitive game information. Guild secrets, player seconds are examples of things not allowed.
- Use common sense and be respectful towards each other at all times, even when disagreeing.
- Do not reveal sensitive game information. Guild secrets, player seconds are examples of things not allowed.
Re: If the game were nerfed ...
Re: If the game were nerfed ...
Thank you Gorboth
sounds interesting and much less worrying! Will look forward to the next update.
sounds interesting and much less worrying! Will look forward to the next update.
Re: If the game were nerfed ...
Sooo Rangers will have more CAID to work with???????
Re: If the game were nerfed ...
What is CAID?
Re: If the game were nerfed ...
They're getting a recode to be brought up to current standards (pre-nerf). Infer from that what you will.Johnny wrote:Sooo Rangers will have more CAID to work with???????
Combat Aid. It refers to a guilds' coded benefits to combat abilities.Drazson wrote:What is CAID?
http://tworzymyatmosfere.pl/przescieradla-jedwabne-z-gumka/