I'm not Redblade, but I do have a feeling of something that is unclear.
Really, it is not unclear, and the interpretation is not unclear either, but both are in total conflict with eachother.
"Using triggers to hunt another player ... will result in..."
This is as clear as water from a spring creek running down from the mountains.
Using triggers to hunt other players is forbidden. It will result in warnings and penalties.
An interpretation is not needed, as the text is 100% clear.
BUT, the current interpretation of the rule suddenly say it is allowed to hunt players with triggers IF......
The IF statement is not there in the rules.
It is no where to be found in the rules.
It suddenly popped up when AoP wrote a post on the subject clarifying his personal interpretation of the rules.
Using triggers is allowed IF you type the movement directions manually.
This interpetation is a complete farse, unless you put it, the IF statement, in the rules.
You should not have such IF/BUT/ELSE in rules, if they are not there to be seen.
They should not be invisible. Put them in the rules, or do not use them.
That is my feeling of something that is bad.
EDIT: Oh, btw, I also think Cartago should be destroyed.