Re: Hektor 3 shots a Necro Titan for being a Necromancer
Posted: 18 Apr 2011 19:19
Draugor.
I believe I am entitled to my opinions as you are yours. I disagree with your reasoning on layman and occupational guilds.
You assume it was tallon they would use to kill you there. Also you assume it is only location based - this is not the case. I am not going into details as per your own reasoning. Is it possible they will need more -absolutely. I was speculating mind you. Do you think a mage would need 2 spells or more?
I was not saying MM do this or that. I am simply saying that pfighting is part of the game and if you join a guild with a certain theme (occupational or layman) you might expect guilds of an opposing theme to do just that.. oppose you. Again. I was told by some layman angmars that they were Angmars first and then occupational second, same for certain bloodguards. It just seems like an easy way out to say it is a one way thing? But maybe that is just me. Join a guild. Expect theme. Thats my view - feel free to have your own:)
You say that if you can 3 shot someone you should never attack them. So no matter what they do you would never attack someone you have a more than fair advantage against? Can you say all your kills and attacks have been in that line Draugor?
Ilrahil. I just seem to recall you screaming at me on MSN (along with other interesting excerpts from a very impressive arsenal of a vocabularium that you were close to titan and now I had ruined that for you, it is very possible I am wrong! The logs I have do not show size).
You write in a heading that I attack on the basis of you being a necromancer, now you write you don't really remember at all. That suggests to me that it is propaganda. Why write it then? Whether that is really your intent, I don't know. I just presented my experience of that incident.
I have seen a legend BDA slash take champions 2 health levels as well. Do you suggest then that spells (which are burst in nature) should do less? Also. Do we compare a caster vs a caster? Because there are spells out there faster and in each more powerful per hit than the gaze ever was - against all targets, evil or not.
Never did I suggest that the 3 trolls hitting you was a factor, or that my teammembers assisted. However, just saying that if you were fighting terel trolls as a hero/titan, there might be spells in the PoT/MM arsenal that would be far more dangerous than the SC gaze and not require 3 shots but less. Maybe that was unclear in my note. Note I am not going for a nerf MM or PoT here, just wondering about the base of comparison.
Regarding the Manowar log.
You are very right - I certainly did not use my entire arsenal. Had I used the entire arsenal, I can tell you it would (both old and current SC version) have been _much less_ effective vs him than they were you. You can take my word for it or not.
I did not present that note as a SC are poor/AA are great. I did not even post it. I am just responding to your note suggesting I kill people for being necromancers and complaining about the balance, which I then try to draw some comparisons to.

You assume it was tallon they would use to kill you there. Also you assume it is only location based - this is not the case. I am not going into details as per your own reasoning. Is it possible they will need more -absolutely. I was speculating mind you. Do you think a mage would need 2 spells or more?
I was not saying MM do this or that. I am simply saying that pfighting is part of the game and if you join a guild with a certain theme (occupational or layman) you might expect guilds of an opposing theme to do just that.. oppose you. Again. I was told by some layman angmars that they were Angmars first and then occupational second, same for certain bloodguards. It just seems like an easy way out to say it is a one way thing? But maybe that is just me. Join a guild. Expect theme. Thats my view - feel free to have your own:)
You say that if you can 3 shot someone you should never attack them. So no matter what they do you would never attack someone you have a more than fair advantage against? Can you say all your kills and attacks have been in that line Draugor?
Ilrahil. I just seem to recall you screaming at me on MSN (along with other interesting excerpts from a very impressive arsenal of a vocabularium that you were close to titan and now I had ruined that for you, it is very possible I am wrong! The logs I have do not show size).
You write in a heading that I attack on the basis of you being a necromancer, now you write you don't really remember at all. That suggests to me that it is propaganda. Why write it then? Whether that is really your intent, I don't know. I just presented my experience of that incident.
I have seen a legend BDA slash take champions 2 health levels as well. Do you suggest then that spells (which are burst in nature) should do less? Also. Do we compare a caster vs a caster? Because there are spells out there faster and in each more powerful per hit than the gaze ever was - against all targets, evil or not.
Never did I suggest that the 3 trolls hitting you was a factor, or that my teammembers assisted. However, just saying that if you were fighting terel trolls as a hero/titan, there might be spells in the PoT/MM arsenal that would be far more dangerous than the SC gaze and not require 3 shots but less. Maybe that was unclear in my note. Note I am not going for a nerf MM or PoT here, just wondering about the base of comparison.
Regarding the Manowar log.
You are very right - I certainly did not use my entire arsenal. Had I used the entire arsenal, I can tell you it would (both old and current SC version) have been _much less_ effective vs him than they were you. You can take my word for it or not.
I did not present that note as a SC are poor/AA are great. I did not even post it. I am just responding to your note suggesting I kill people for being necromancers and complaining about the balance, which I then try to draw some comparisons to.