Re: Alignment
Posted: 22 Jun 2016 07:48
Personally, i think the alignment system is way too simplistic. Knights are good. But they have had their issues with other races classed as good. They were even prepared to go to war with the elves and dwarves over a dragon orb! At one point during the War of the Lance the people of Kalaman were more than happy to lynch a knight.
And I don't have to talk about dwarves. Both hill and mountain dwarves are technically "good", but they have such strong blood feuds that they would take as much joy out of bashing one of the cousins as they would a greenskin.
If we were to really have a look at this system, I'd almost prefer a dynamic reputation system for the different races and guilds that would change based on a players actions.. killing or attacking certain creatures, joining certain guilds etc.
Now that would be a system that would be a lot of work
. But while we are talking pie-in-the-sky stuff I thought i'd add it 
And I don't have to talk about dwarves. Both hill and mountain dwarves are technically "good", but they have such strong blood feuds that they would take as much joy out of bashing one of the cousins as they would a greenskin.
If we were to really have a look at this system, I'd almost prefer a dynamic reputation system for the different races and guilds that would change based on a players actions.. killing or attacking certain creatures, joining certain guilds etc.
Now that would be a system that would be a lot of work

