The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Forum rules
- Use common sense and be respectful towards each other at all times, even when disagreeing.
- Do not reveal sensitive game information. Guild secrets, player seconds are examples of things not allowed.
- Use common sense and be respectful towards each other at all times, even when disagreeing.
- Do not reveal sensitive game information. Guild secrets, player seconds are examples of things not allowed.
The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
After having been back for a couple of weeks, I feel this is a matter of necessity.
Nil Mortifi Sine Lucre
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
nils wrote:After having been back for a couple of weeks, I feel this is a matter of necessity.
I'd go with "Army of papertanks"
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Army of Angmar is a perfectly balanced guild and is all a melee guild in Genesis should be.
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
AA unplayable?
You know nothing.
You know nothing.
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Angmar is a melee guild.Kvator wrote:AA unplayable?
You know nothing.
The SS is not.
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Zugzug wrote:Angmar is a melee guild.Kvator wrote:AA unplayable?
You know nothing.
The SS is not.
*fighter guild
SS would be ranger/thief (all kenders are thieves stop denying it) But with the change to points doled out they should be more efficient rather soon.
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
There were changes to ss already (month ago or so).Draugor wrote:Zugzug wrote:Angmar is a melee guild.Kvator wrote:AA unplayable?
You know nothing.
The SS is not.
*fighter guild
SS would be ranger/thief (all kenders are thieves stop denying it) But with the change to points doled out they should be more efficient rather soon.
Not spectacular (as expected). In result SS moved above RoN (they were tied before change).
It' still tank oriented guild that force u to play one of least tanky races and prevent you from using shield. Great design!
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
With all the added points you should have gotten atleast weaponskill that doesent completely blow, and since it's themewise made to not be a tankguild but a ranger/rogue one and rangers where not exactly known for agression and fighting as such.
Designwise, bring it up with the coding wizard or the current GM if they want to make changes, likelly not but it doesent hurt to ask
Designwise, bring it up with the coding wizard or the current GM if they want to make changes, likelly not but it doesent hurt to ask
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Wanna do some tests and comparisons between our 'rogue type' guilds?Draugor wrote:since it's themewise made to not be a tankguild but a ranger/rogue one and rangers where not exactly known for agression and fighting as such.
(got alts in RoI and Archers if u wanna make it more spicy!)As for 'asking wizards' - been there already. No result.
At least lance is unbalanced so I can solo-grind a little in GK!
Re: The Army of Angmar needs a new name.
Kvator wrote:Wanna do some tests and comparisons between our 'rogue type' guilds?Draugor wrote:since it's themewise made to not be a tankguild but a ranger/rogue one and rangers where not exactly known for agression and fighting as such.
As for 'asking wizards' - been there already. No result.
At least lance is unbalanced so I can solo-grind a little in GK!
Oh I know rangers suck as do kendersm bad design, faulty balance, people with no clue etc all are factors, that's the curse of the "rogue" guilds so to speak sadly, so if you want to be able to grind, start teaming or switch guilds
http://tworzymyatmosfere.pl/przescieradla-jedwabne-z-gumka/